you sir is truly an artist (THIS SHIT IS COOL AF)

you sir is truly an artist (THIS SHIT IS COOL AF)

What's this thing playing that sounds like a jew's harp but it's not quite one (I think)?

What's this thing playing that sounds like a jew's harp but it's not quite one (I think)?

each new week there's just that one improvement that you add that just stands out in small but noticeable way that just catch's my ear, bravo for make it to week ten with a great song,

each new week there's just that one improvement that you add that just stands out in small but noticeable way that just catch's my ear, bravo for make it to week ten with a great song,

Thank you for your kind words!

That's (ι) on the sample list above (i.e. https://weeklybeats.com/b+bro/music/jaw-harping), and I'm sure it's a recording of an actual jaw harp, but I chopped up the sample, applied eq and pitched it down. b bro, who played it, happened to comment right after you...

Thank you!

[quote=moloko]you sir is truly an artist (THIS SHIT IS COOL AF)[/quote] Thank you for your kind words! :) [quote=moloko]What's this thing playing that sounds like a jew's harp but it's not quite one (I think)?[/quote] That's (ι) on the sample list above (i.e. https://weeklybeats.com/b+bro/music/jaw-harping), and I'm sure it's a recording of an actual jaw harp, but I chopped up the sample, applied eq and pitched it down. b bro, who played it, happened to comment right after you... [quote=b bro]each new week there's just that one improvement that you add that just stands out in small but noticeable way that just catch's my ear, bravo for make it to week ten with a great song,[/quote] Thank you!

URL BREAKING TRACK TITLE LET'S GO!

URL BREAKING TRACK TITLE LET'S GO!

hehe, yes, i started to note letters dropping out at the end of the title, and had to remove the spaces to keep them in. i hope this format will hold till the end of the alphabet

[quote=orangedrink]URL BREAKING TRACK TITLE LET'S GO![/quote] hehe, yes, i started to note letters dropping out at the end of the title, and had to remove the spaces to keep them in. i hope this format will hold till the end of the alphabet

oh god I just realized these must all be mp3 samples and I'm breaking out in a cold sweat

oh god I just realized these must all be mp3 samples and I'm breaking out in a cold sweat :)

Yeah, fidelity-wise, it's not ideal, esp. not when slowing down the pitch. Workflow-wise, it's unproblematic though, since modern samplers like Mimic and Serato reads mp3s without conversion.

[quote=orangedrink]oh god I just realized these must all be mp3 samples and I'm breaking out in a cold sweat :)[/quote] Yeah, fidelity-wise, it's not ideal, esp. not when slowing down the pitch. Workflow-wise, it's unproblematic though, since modern samplers like Mimic and Serato reads mp3s without conversion.

just kidding, i've had some awful quality source material published to CD and vinyl

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

just kidding, i've had some awful quality source material published to CD and vinyl ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

I come back here every week to see what's new. Never disappointing!

So my idea is this. Once 52 weeks are done, this is 57 minutes of music. So then you combine them somehow into an hour-long set, right?

I come back here every week to see what's new. Never disappointing! So my idea is this. Once 52 weeks are done, this is 57 minutes of music. So then you combine them somehow into an hour-long set, right?

the musical quality is nr. uno

Thanks!

yes, that's the gist of it, although i'll just go till the end of the alphabet before the combining mix, i.e. two more weeks. more layering than that would require narrow brick wall eq-ing, i think. after that, i'll start another concept series

[quote=orangedrink]just kidding, i've had some awful quality source material published to CD and vinyl ¯\_(ツ)_/¯[/quote] the musical quality is nr. uno [quote=rplktr]I come back here every week to see what's new. Never disappointing! So my idea is this. Once 52 weeks are done, this is 57 minutes of music. So then you combine them somehow into an hour-long set, right?[/quote] Thanks! yes, that's the gist of it, although i'll just go till the end of the alphabet before the combining mix, i.e. two more weeks. more layering than that would require narrow brick wall eq-ing, i think. after that, i'll start another concept series

128kbps is the new tape ;P

[quote=orangedrink]just kidding, i've had some awful quality source material published to CD and vinyl ¯\_(ツ)_/¯[/quote] 128kbps is the new tape ;P

another perk of this channel is that you can miss a few weeks and still be up to date XD

another perk of this channel is that you can miss a few weeks and still be up to date XD

In some ways better than my old tapes which I re-recorded to endless times.

True. Although the amount of new samples per week is constant (2), the % of new samples compared to the track as a whole is decreasing ( from 1/1 week one to 1/12 week 12)

[quote=XC3N][quote=orangedrink]just kidding, i've had some awful quality source material published to CD and vinyl ¯\_(ツ)_/¯[/quote] 128kbps is the new tape ;P[/quote] In some ways better than my old tapes which I re-recorded to endless times. [quote=XC3N]another perk of this channel is that you can miss a few weeks and still be up to date XD[/quote] True. Although the amount of new samples per week is constant (2), the % of new samples compared to the track as a whole is decreasing ( from 1/1 week one to 1/12 week 12)