I can't wait to do my all electronic piece

BDR wrote:

I bleep and bloop without chip. What does that mean?

does this mean you are synthetic chip?

467

(33 replies, posted in Site Help)

one quick fix that I could think of: on the mp3 player, color code each week's submissions, since it goes straight from week 1 to week 2

468

(33 replies, posted in General Discussion)

I'm really happy at how mine ended up sounding. I have done very little with overdubs in the past so it was fun. the only thing I didn't like is that the track ended up sounding a little monotonous in spots, a little more loopy than I had intended (time constraints are interesting though, sometimes i end up spending too much time on something).

469

(33 replies, posted in Site Help)

spry wrote:

so im just throwing this out there, but what if it were the case that all first week musicians music got put into "week 1" and for each week that you put in an additional song you would advance a week for your "week 2" song and so on.  once you reach 52 weeks you get inducted into the site hall of fame or something.  if that were the case, the website could keep going on after 2012 with it still be fully open to all new participants to complete the 52 week challenge.  this way if the site picks up a lot of popularity later on in the year (which im thinking it just might if things keep being this awesome..) it will allow the people who started at the beginning to maintain their original timeline while still allowing new people to enter and get the full experience.  that being said, i dont know how hard that would be to do, or if other people doing this would be interested in this sort of thing, but i figured itd be worth sharing.

I like this idea. would make it easy to see who is still in the running for the 52 weeks thing...

470

(15 replies, posted in General Discussion)

can do some vocals for someone's track. if you can provide lyrics, that'd be preferred. but if interested send me a message, if I can be at least given some lyrical direction that'd help. I don't have the greatest voice but can stay in key, do multitracking, fx, etc.

471

(25 replies, posted in General Discussion)

koan sent. let's each do a piece based on the koan, then remix. after the piece is finished we can talk about how to go about remixing the pieces. until then meditate on the koan til next week, then execute.

the main benefit of not allowing more people is that it would control the amount of tracks uploaded, which would be both a good and a bad thing.

473

(5 replies, posted in General Discussion)

I was going to do something like this but thought it might be a little weird. here are my picks anyway:

(alphabetical)
beastmode
boomlinde
cooshinator
dataline
frostbyte
fullautostop
lomz
mattnida
nwspr
paper buildings
protman
samuelbruce
seagull chainsaw
starpause
thursday bloom
tristan louth-robins

I like the majority of the pieces though, these are just the ones that stuck out to me right away

474

(25 replies, posted in General Discussion)

I also do some reading on western quantum physics, which means I could be interested in the metaphysics.

475

(25 replies, posted in General Discussion)

I tend to conjure my material out of thin air, but I have no idea how that would be quantified in an occult sense. the ones that you listed that appeal to me are zen, i-ching, and taoism. I just got a book on i-ching, and this is a pretty common "occult" practice, so maybe that would be a way to go. plus it would get me to start reading the book tongue

Sphax wrote:

There is a specification about "using samples" i'd like to know?

In my track, i'm using some samples from a Hitchcock movie, which I didn't know if I could use it (but I did it anyway).
I'll certainly use some Jazz (or other genres) samples in my future tracks and I don't know how it works for using them without being deleted?

my two cents: I'm going to end up using some samples at one point, but I plan on only using a few seconds and making the unrecognizable. otherwise, there might be copyright issues. I think there's a thread in the forum somewhere about sample usage.

roboctopus wrote:

I've been working on 2 main things the last few months that I hope to hone. The first is that I want to create a really organic, natural-sounding fusion of chip music and acoustic elements. The second is to really stretch my chord progressions, incorporating more jazz chords and interesting shifts. So I'm hoping to explore and refine these ideas, with the goal of crafting a really focused album.

I'm also excited about doing a bunch of goofy one-offs.  tongue

Just from the first week, I can tell there are going to be a lot of interesting and exciting compositions coming out of this.

sounds pretty interesting... I think if anyone is turned off by chiptune is the overwhelming artificial sound of it. nice challenge to combine that with more natural sounds....

also jazz chords are fun to play... making up chords is usually what I do. some more interesting shifts is always one of the toughest things to work on, the best ones at least in my experience come out of nowhere. I'd like to work on shifts as well, gotta add that to the list.

I think this will keep me on my toes, I have been wanting to push my electronic music to something better, or more deliberate at least. I guess that's the main thing I need to work on is composition, so I'm hoping the progression will be that I become a better composer... 52 songs in a row should help! lol. I also hope to share some of my band's music, which has been difficult to promote. we've done a number of shows and about that many albums. I would like for the band to get more focused as well, but that's another story and is not really for me to decide. Anyway, I hope to progress and learn from this and other musicians here. I hope people make time to talk on the discussion boards, it could be just as rewarding as sharing the music itself.

479

(75 replies, posted in General Discussion)

I found out about this only about 4 hours before the deadline, and luckily I like to record a lot after new year's. my band recorded on new year's day, and then a few days later I recorded a rather minimalist (for me) composition. the band uses lots of layers and I tend to do that in my electronic music as well, so this was a nice change of pace. the recording actually turned out pretty quiet, that was a little bit of a concern. but that allowed some of the background noise of the city outside to emerge (what you hear at the beginning of the track; the guitar drones emerge from the noise floor). turned out pretty cool, just did some edits to remove some noisier parts that didn't go along with the rest of the drones and used the compand vst plugin along with some eqing and threw a little reverb on it, as well as an analog mastering plugin that I like to use. was a pretty simple project for the first week, since it was produced live using two mics and two amps with the guitar placed precariously on top of the smaller amp (vox) and pointed away from the other amp (marshall).

480

(24 replies, posted in General Discussion)

sounds like a great idea, especially since some weeks there will probably be A TON of tracks... I agree week 1 is quite good!