Gnarlysunshine wrote:

I may have to play around with that, Phil.  I've only used the sends for that kind of thing before, but I'm really intrigued by the panning effects you're talking about.  Thanks!

yeah. you get can some really cool effects by splitting a sound into multiple channels and filtering them. thats how a lot of neurofunk type basses are done. For example: you take a reese sound (usually 3 detuned saws) and split it into 3 or 4 channels. One for the low end. one or two for mids, and one for the highs.. and you process them separately to get all kinds of wacky intense sounding shit. By doing that you are doing multiband processing. just like in a multiband compressor or multi-band distortion.  Or you could go fucking crazy and pitch shift your copies and build chords out of the same sound.. all kinds of possibilities of multi-channel processing.

Patcher?  Never used that you can just route the audio from the mixer channel to another mixer channel and add more effects. The little buttons at the bottom of the mixer view allows you to select where you want the audio to go. You right click to not have it go to a channel.. so if you wanted to route  channel 5 to channel 6 you would disable routing to the master and enable routing to channel 6. If you send it to multiple channels, you can do cool stuff like having different effects effecting the same sound and panning them differently and what not..

really.. ALL of them?

huh huh.. he said BooB

693

(21 replies, posted in General Discussion)

personally I really liked my track for week 8. it was disjointed and the mix was kinda fucked but the melodies and harmonies turned out great.. had fun experimenting with tossing in 1/3 notes into straight 4/4 time and then jizzing all over kari from mythbusters in my mind wink

694

(21 replies, posted in General Discussion)

one week at a time.. that's how we will make it through. I mean, look, we are already almost 1/5 of the way done wink

695

(21 replies, posted in General Discussion)

Hmm. havent really heard anyone talking about week 8.. thoughts? Are we losing steam?

roboctopus wrote:
HANDCANNON wrote:

chances are i wont finish in time. id rather release something of quality than force something bad out. thats kind of what i did with my first one.

Boo!  Hiss!

Throw us your unfinished song!  We, like, are cool with that here.  tongue

speak for yourself wink   The rules say the songs have to be finished. whatever that means

697

(10 replies, posted in General Discussion)

ahoy.

698

(36 replies, posted in General Discussion)

WTF GUYS! there is never anyone in the irc channel.. go now!  http://esper.net

699

(51 replies, posted in General Discussion)

you know if your hand is bigger than your face you're retarded?

700

(51 replies, posted in General Discussion)

analog said they would make one!

701

(51 replies, posted in General Discussion)

tIB wrote:

Wait, there's cake at the end? I'm a dead cert then!


it sounds like there might be a cake wink

702

(11 replies, posted in General Discussion)

we should steal his account and all collab to make his track every week wink

703

(51 replies, posted in General Discussion)

get a different player then.. one that he doesnt know about.. but wtf.. why is he anti-itunes?

704

(51 replies, posted in General Discussion)

what do we get if we make 52 tracks?   a cake?