In fact, reading back over the thread (and my post) again, it's probably simplest to think like this: music is made up fundamentally of SOUND placed in TIME. Rhythm is a property of TIME. A melody is made by placing different notes in TIME, which is what bagpipes do. Any time you CHANGE a note you're doing so in a rhythm. All the stuff people talk about as "music theory" is just a bunch of paradigms established coming from the European music of the 16-1900s. You do NOT need to know this to compose music.

Bagpipes are what are called "drone" instruments - they produce a fundamental pitch that is constant and can move notes above that. OP, I find it very hard to believe you can read music but not understand an interval or rhythm/time division.

When you're talking about "music theory" (blech...) what people generally mean is "harmony": the placing of two or more notes together. There are a bunch of names and functions for the type of harmony known as "common practice" (stemming from the period from Bach to Wagner, and appropriated into Jazz), but what you NEED to know if you know nothing is that there are two or more notes sounding at the same time to produce harmony. Usually three (hence the term triad) or four (a tetrad) notes in a chord. What the notes are doesn't matter for all intents and purposes, but if you want to deal with functional common-practice harmony, then it does - this is where intervals come in. An interval is the distance between two notes, and Brackleforth outlines the basis of all that more than adequately so I won't bother.

You mentioned rhythm/time before. Rhythm is simple the division of musical time into segments. For example, a segment that is ONE bar long in 4/4 time at a crotchet tempo of 60 equates to four seconds of time. Two bars equals eight seconds, and so on. So you can think of that period of TIME as being divided in a tree.

8 Seconds (4/4 time, crotchet = 60)

Divide by two = 2 x 4 second chunks of time

Then you divide each of those chunks of time into a parent rhythmic value (the numerator of the time signature: the top 4 of 4/4), in this case you're dividing each 4 second chunk into four even rhythms - crotchets (or quarter notes - you can look up rhythmic division for terminology somewhere else), giving you four even rhythmic impulses over four seconds, or four "beats" per bar, each worth approximately one second of produced sound.

You can then divide each of those parent "beats" into other, smaller chunks, and so on.

It is important to note two things: 1) that dividing that 8 seconds into 2 lots of 4 was arbitrary, you can divide anything in almost any way you can imagine, all that will change is the duration of the produced rhythm; and 2) the values of things changes depending on the speed (tempo) through which it all moves. If you had a crotchet tempo of 120bpm, then that eight seconds of time would produce twice as many bars of 4/4 once divided.

I hope that helps.

67

(21 replies, posted in Site Help)

I have been popping over to Europe on average every two years since 2012, so and may be coming over this year - funding allowing - to do a project in London.

I'm glad so many people like my advice. One of the most damaging things to come out of the romantic era is the idea of 'perfection'. Ugh.

laguna wrote:

I spent 2015 polishing some WB'14 mixes (my Soundcloud lives still in 2014!), rearranging my studio, developing my skills in Chuck musical programming language and learning some Reaktor also.

I built myself a small modular setup and made my first steps in hardware design (still choosing an oscilloscope to buy...). Improved my workflow and got back to some old-school hardware samplers, which I used to create some soundbanks for 2016.

I've got some tracks ready for an EP, my first Bandcamp release: some ambient/drone/berlin-school stuff a little bit far from my usual Boom Bap/Hiphop-esque stuff. Got back to Blender and Processing so I can match the artwork you guys put in your releases.

And, also very important, I kept track of some of my favourite WeeklyBeaters smile

Chuck? Hardcore. Interested to see stuff you have done/will do with that.

My advice to everyone, ever: get over preciousness and just MAKE stuff.

71

(11 replies, posted in General Discussion)

PureData. https://puredata.info
SuperCollider. http://supercollider.github.io

2012: Was good. "Production" value improved.
2014: Was good.
2016: I'm still not 100% sure I'll participate, as I have a PhD to finish and am doing a fair bit of teaching. But if I do, I suspect it will probably be quite a bit of generative stuff with Max (maybe Pd). If I can muster up the motivation I'll teach myself SuperCollider through the process. Also work more with OpenMusic.

During 2013 and 2015 I spent more time doing notated music than I usually do during WB years. That won't necessarily be true this time 'round, as I have a few pieces in the works already and some plans for some others. Depending on how the year pans out, there may also be some live stuff, electronics + other instruments/electronics. Who knows. 2013-15 I have spent a lot of time making tools to do nifty things, so chances are I'll use them a lot due to being really quite strapped for time.

rANGEL wrote:

Last year was a great learning experience for me as an artist. I managed to make 52 songs and 52 videos.
This year I will focus on music coding with the Sonic Pi live coding environment (+synths + Ableton Live + iOS...).
To get out of my comfort zone, I also intend to work with my own voice yikes

Sonic Pi, nice!

74

(80 replies, posted in General Discussion)

laguna wrote:

Hi Guys! Really missed you all

I started messing with my samplers yesterday, and the track is already cookin'

Technical Question:By any chance, is the old site still stored/archived anywhere, so I could back up some notes about some songs I made

... This really really really means a lot to me. I've been waiting for months!!!

I'm not admin, but if you click on "music", then "year", then filter by "my music", you should get it.

75

(80 replies, posted in General Discussion)

Ipaghost wrote:
Devieus wrote:

The site runs on money, so if you want to help, money will do it.

Without knowing the amount of traffic WB, it's hard to guesstimate how much it costs for hosting, but I doubt finding the money to run the site would be difficult from donations or even minimal membership fees. Even the bulk of hosting could be done off site via services like soundcloud and youtube which would make costs completely negligible. Either way, Tim doesn't strike me as someone who doesn't know how to find the proper resources if he is motivated! So let's motivate him people!

(This is the first badger of many until wb2016 is announced!)

Trash80 was accepting donations last time. I think there's a thread about it somewhere.

The site uses AWS, so the hosting requirement/cost grows with use. I reckon that if everybody who was keen emailed Trash80 and chipped in US$20, it might be a goer?

colorful grey wrote:

If nobody else is volunteering, I can set up a bandcamp page for a selection of your WB-2014 tracks. Let me know which one you want, and a wave file, and I can work on compiling?

That all depends on the aesthetic of the compilation! Curate!

Mr Mort wrote:

So i made a basic facebook page for the project.

FACEBOOKPAGE

Cool.

If it's original compositions for the project then I must decline, I'm afraid. Hope it goes well for y'all!

Mort: here is fine, or email (vin at vgiles dot net) or a Facebook group or google+ (same email address) or whatever.

colorful grey wrote:
Ipaghost wrote:

Awww yisss!

Hey um... @ipaghost... not to single you out or something but you might be a great candidate for a visual "aesthetic" as @vinpous mentioned above... you're not busy right?? :-)

Sonic aesthetic, I thought. tongue

Mr Mort wrote:

Salut you filthy animals. It was a pleasure to have taken such a perilous journey. Ive seen and heard the improvements in sound, quality, composition and creativity from all of you. I hope this isnt the end for us!
We should all keep in touch or make a comp album with everyone that wants to be on it!

Whos downsies?

Yeah I'm down if somebody wants to do the curating for it/set guidelines for aesthetics/etc.