113

(50 replies, posted in General Discussion)

little-scale wrote:

Good point.

Each week we subtract 5 minutes from the 45 minutes.

Sounds like a plan, 'Scale.

114

(305 replies, posted in General Discussion)

little-scale wrote:

.|

LOL.

115

(136 replies, posted in General Discussion)

116

(136 replies, posted in General Discussion)

..and sarcasm.

Fisticuffs and sarcasm. Yeah big_smile

117

(136 replies, posted in General Discussion)

Fisticuffs.

118

(136 replies, posted in General Discussion)

idevourstatic wrote:

I got a job!!

Hooray(?)

119

(50 replies, posted in General Discussion)

vinpous wrote:

I would be interested, potentially. My week 21 was composed, but not produced, in about 55 minutes. Total time was about 1:20 including polishing the sound in Logic a little. I think 45 minutes is a fair goal.

I was initially thinking 25-minutes...45 was a number chosen at random.

120

(305 replies, posted in General Discussion)

Killjoys.

I want to [kill] them all.

121

(50 replies, posted in General Discussion)

Phil Harmonic wrote:

hmm.. dunno.. good stuff can come out of limitations like that, but im pretty sure thats not what wb is about..   ill do a 45 min race track if anyone else is in, but i'd really rather not.

Oh? What is WeeklyBeats about then, Phil?

P.S. You're in no way obligated to participate.

122

(15 replies, posted in General Discussion)

^^^

123

(50 replies, posted in General Discussion)

Personally, pumping out a creative work a week, and regardless it's breadth, size or depth, is rather difficult. neutral

It might be all about "getting to the page," but by gad there are some Sunday nights when the challenge of WeeklyBeats feels like mere self-flagellation and therefore NOT WORTH IT!!

And so, following a brief conversation with LS this morning, I thought I would propose the concept of creating a track (during either the coming or a future week)  in no more than 45-minutes. Materials, tools, concept etc. can be decided upon in advance but ultimately the contributor has exactly 45-minutes in which to compose, edit and produce the work; no more, no less.

Unless the interested are able to convene in the same space on any given day to undertake the proposed concept, exactly how this exercise would be monitored is beyond me... all thoughts, queries, rebuttals etc. appreciated.

I heart/hate WBs. :: )

124

(305 replies, posted in General Discussion)

Hackneyed theories... omfg.

125

(136 replies, posted in General Discussion)

Phil Harmonic wrote:
Poppi wrote:

Chivalry.

Died with the last century when women decided they wanted to be equal to men and didnt start opening doors for us.

*yawn*

126

(136 replies, posted in General Discussion)

Chivalry.

Done. 

Where can I hear the original? ..and are you calling yourself 'Sphazz' now? How odd =P

128

(136 replies, posted in General Discussion)

"Being able to afford (in theory)", a trip to Cootamundra to practice field recording with Doug Quin. Yay for study trips (and augmentation of preexisting skills) big_smile