97

(50 replies, posted in General Discussion)

iran sanad wrote:

cooooool

I don't know that I will end up doing this challenge. Ironically, it feels like too much work now.

LOL (not really).

And so, apologies in advance if I dip out (and of WBs altogether). WAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHH etc.

98

(136 replies, posted in General Discussion)

Neighbours who quietly turn their kitchen light on so you don't have to hang your washing up in the dark. FWW indeed.

99

(305 replies, posted in General Discussion)

People who steal clothes pegs. F*cking kleptos.

100

(50 replies, posted in General Discussion)

iran sanad wrote:

this week?

I guess so, and those who have chosen to participate could perhaps post a link to their track here after it has gone live.

101

(50 replies, posted in General Discussion)

No Philip. I'm exhausted.

102

(136 replies, posted in General Discussion)

Genuine affection.

And sparrows.

103

(50 replies, posted in General Discussion)

[you] are right, as always, my suggestion was trite (and unworthy of your attention).

So don't do it, it could f*ck you up FOREVER.

heart

104

(305 replies, posted in General Discussion)

Mmm.

105

(305 replies, posted in General Discussion)

Phil Harmonic wrote:

heart  Foxy-Diamonds does not look like a monkey.. but she does look whinged.. She should be our mascot here wink

Haha big_smile ...a combination of her underbite (which means she's got magic powers) and the fact that she'd just woken up, perhaps.

106

(305 replies, posted in General Discussion)

Phil Harmonic wrote:
Poppi wrote:

A dog.

yes.. i gathered that much.. is foxy-diamonds your dog? are there pics?

107

(305 replies, posted in General Discussion)

Phil Harmonic wrote:
Poppi wrote:

Foxy-Diamonds had her first haircut and now she resembles a monkey more than a puppy. I don't think this is a win...

who is foxy-diamonds?

A dog.

108

(305 replies, posted in General Discussion)

Foxy-Diamonds had her first haircut and now she resembles a monkey more than a puppy. I don't think this is a win...

109

(50 replies, posted in General Discussion)

iran sanad wrote:

withstanding the armageddon? i'm into it?
no?
too much?
shut up ran?

"Never enough." heart

110

(305 replies, posted in General Discussion)

little-scale wrote:

yes that is what happened.

*insert whale face*

111

(50 replies, posted in General Discussion)

little-scale wrote:

I'm going to screencast mine.

How would you do that? And how do you recommend monitoring the participant's activity...a remote 'crate?

heart THE PANOPTICON.

112

(50 replies, posted in General Discussion)

Phil Harmonic wrote:

Well. ok. maybe it does fit within the limitations of weeklybeats, but it seems to me that weekly beats already has a time limitation. Changing the limitation to 45 minutes makes it not weeklybeats but rather 45minutebeats.

10080 minutes in 1 week == the amount of allotted time in which to create a WBs track, from production to post-production and upload.

My suggestion is the realisation of a WB track within a set timeframe of 45-minutes. That leaves a remaining 10035 minutes in the allotted timeframe of 1 week to do whatever else one does prior to the writing, editing, production and upload phases of their work – for example: sourcing of sounds/samples, creation of virtual synths/synth modules, selection and set up of instruments and/or recording environment, w*nking off, etc.

In any event, I was neither claiming originality nor that the concept was fully formed (and therefore designed to withstand armageddon), it's a suggestion.

big_smile