Weeklybeats is a 52 week long music project in which artists compose and publicly release 1 song a week for the entire year.
Starting January 1st 2024 GMT each participant will have one week to upload one finished composition. Any style of music or selection of instruments are welcomed and encouraged. Sign up or Login to get started or check our FAQ for any help or questions you may have.

WeeklyBeats.com / Music / Suhpos's music / Interference

Interference

By Suhpos on February 11, 2024 4:23 pm

Last sunday I found a bunch of old electronics "junk" at the local recycling station, which sparked my first idea to use only these things to make a whole track. I ended up only using the thing in the top left corner (if anybody knows what it is I'm very curious, i guess it's some kind of high voltage thing?) to make a kind of scrapey sound. I have been struggling a little bit with microphone interference, so i started swinging it around to find the sources. Turns out there are a lot interesting noises inside my computer, so I decided to just lean into it. Then I went for a very harsh sound and considered stopping there and calling it noise music. But i started early in the week this time around so I had lots of opportunity to change my mind.

I had doubled and pitched this "noise track" a fifth apart, which gave the tonal foundation for the rest. I added chords using the melodica, flutter tongue, moving around the microphone, double tracked and with a lot of delay. I quite like this sound but maybe some of the detail drowned a bit in the mix and the delay. at some point I almost turned it into a song, felt a bit hippy meditation music-esque. I didn't like it, so I went in a different direction. The bass i made by recording an alto recorder and pitching it down, again double tracked, the other an octave below with saturation. and the alto recorder also made the high pitch sound towards the end.

I'm trying to learn how to do mastering, and i spent a while fiddling around with this track, maybe i should really have spent some more time in the mixing stage. I don't know if i made it better, but any opinion and criticism is more than welcome.

Audio works licensed by author under:
CC Attribution Noncommercial Share Alike (BY-NC-SA)

Awesome and fearless noise texture! So cool to hear what you're experimenting with! Nice choice of chords, they complement the noise and push it forward, and nice wailing voice. I gotta listen again on good speakers but it's already evoking wild imagery when listened on the phone. I guess for this type of sound art one might be pissed off at the listener for not hearing it "correctly" big_smile wonder what your thoughts are on that. For me, that's the job of the mastering, to make it good for listening in as many conditions.

horatiuromantic wrote:

Awesome and fearless noise texture! So cool to hear what you're experimenting with! Nice choice of chords, they complement the noise and push it forward, and nice wailing voice. I gotta listen again on good speakers but it's already evoking wild imagery when listened on the phone. I guess for this type of sound art one might be pissed off at the listener for not hearing it "correctly" big_smile wonder what your thoughts are on that. For me, that's the job of the mastering, to make it good for listening in as many conditions.

Thank you for listening! I don’t know if there is a correct way to listen to this one, i think the noise was pretty harsh sounding from the beginning and i added a good amount of harmonics to the bass so it should show up. I did listen it through on my phone speaker but it was on WB so i guess it was after the fact, but wasn’t thinking to much about that during the making. I was thinking about the problem of dynamics vs loudness when i was trying to do the mastering, and i guess louder and brighter tracks would help with listening through in-ears for example. I think in the end i was trying to get more clarity out which might have been in conflict with the harsh in your face kind of sound i was going for with the noise track. Listening to it now I feel like something is not quite right, but I can’t really put my finger on it.

horatiuromantic wrote:

I guess for this type of sound art one might be pissed off at the listener for not hearing it "correctly" big_smile

This is also an interesting train of thought when considering a listener's mindset/expectations/reactions instead of their listening environment and equipment.

Love this! Really great job of wrangling the harsher timbres as the piece progresses into something that has a surprisingly warm overall tone. It can be really tricky working with sounds like these in a way that doesn't result in something fatiguing or startling to the ear and you've done an excellent job here.

what a neat experiment - the sounds are really interesting

as someone who's really sensitive to high frequency (i can hear dog whistles etc.) sound - this was a rough piece for me as a listener - i had some discomfort even at the lowest setting on my laptop speakers

this might be able to be adjusted in the eq with some filtering without loosing the cool sounds

you can either do that in the individual track in the mix stage & or during your mastering process - i've just started learning more about this - this article does a good job explaining some of the filters

i'd be curious to know where the high frequency sound is sitting on this track in hz

i think that part top left is some kind of air variable capacitor[/img] perhaps from an early crystal radio set of some sort? - that company name on the dial REGAL made parts for radio's & amps in the 1920's era [url=https://www.radiomuseum.org/dsp_hersteller_detail.cfm?company_id=1886]American Specialty Co., The; Bridgeport (CT)

ineff wrote:


This is also an interesting train of thought when considering a listener's mindset/expectations/reactions instead of their listening environment and equipment.


That sounds right… to be honest i find it difficult to think in this way when making music, as listeners come in many different kinds, especially here where someone might listen to it by complete coincidence.


v0 wrote:

Love this! Really great job of wrangling the harsher timbres as the piece progresses into something that has a surprisingly warm overall tone. It can be really tricky working with sounds like these in a way that doesn't result in something fatiguing or startling to the ear and you've done an excellent job here.

Thank you! I think listening to it now I would want it a little bit warmer. Those sounds definitely got my ears tired when i was mixing it.

emily wrote:

what a neat experiment - the sounds are really interesting

as someone who's really sensitive to high frequency (i can hear dog whistles etc.) sound - this was a rough piece for me as a listener - i had some discomfort even at the lowest setting on my laptop speakers

this might be able to be adjusted in the eq with some filtering without loosing the cool sounds

you can either do that in the individual track in the mix stage & or during your mastering process - i've just started learning more about this - this article does a good job explaining some of the filters

i'd be curious to know where the high frequency sound is sitting on this track in hz

Thank you! I’m sorry to have done that to your ears, but thank you for telling me, at least now i have a reference for something that is too much. Even as someone whose hearing is nowhere near yours I also find it slightly fatiguing to listen to (somehow i was thinking of it as kind of feature of the track maybe it really isn’t..). In future maybe i need to consider that if find it fatiguing at all, someone else might find it painful… sorry. And thank you for the information on the components, makes sense with the variable capacitor thing, and very fun too see the illustration of the dial looks so similar.

You need to login to leave a comment.
Login Sign-up