1

(12 replies, posted in General Discussion)

vinpous wrote:

Oh man, I think I've only done a few songs. What do I do? sad

(Note: facetious pedanticism).

ur such an academic m8

I need a link sad Much fail very sleep in

big^

4

(19 replies, posted in General Discussion)

I guess some cakes just kinda look too good to eat?

5

(27 replies, posted in General Discussion)

Provided the house we secure at the end of this hunt isn't a shoebox- i'll be thrilled to host again.

6

(27 replies, posted in General Discussion)

off key as fuck

7

(21 replies, posted in Site Help)

trash80 wrote:

Yeah, I personally have an issue with it. But we'll add it.

There is a difference between a free-one-for-all-everyone-holding-hands culture versus giving permission for a commercial enterprise to profit or misrepresent your creative work.

As long as you know that by selecting such a license- you are legally allowing companies to use your work without consent- which you'd normally get compensated for or have the option to reject their usage. It may even look like you are endorsing the product when they give attribution. It's a awful idea in this society.

Seriously, THINK ABOUT THIS before selecting a licence like this. You could end up directly endorsing something horrible. Not to mention you are seriously devaluing music in general. You're basically shooting yourself in the foot if you ever hope to become a professional.

8

(27 replies, posted in General Discussion)

team 28 neva 4get

9

(25 replies, posted in General Discussion)

3.8% complete!

10

(312 replies, posted in General Discussion)

Sweet vid sebbers!

11

(141 replies, posted in Site Help)

Seriously guys, is it that hard to make a new account?

12

(25 replies, posted in General Discussion)

One week down - 51 to go! You're 1.9% of the way there.

13

(21 replies, posted in Site Help)

Etheross wrote:

I don't really know, but I guess it allows a higher possibility of exposure.

Don't do it hmm

14

(36 replies, posted in General Discussion)

Hey we should do this again.

The rules do not state that a track has to be well produced - just that it has to be "complete".

"Complete" is a very subjective term. However I would probably suggest that it should be treated as you not having anything more you think should be added to/changed about the piece of music. There are many artists on here of varying skill and experiences - something that I might upload as complete might sound terrible compared to another's standards. The point is that you go though the entire composition process from conception to production to mastering in the span of one week (or you can even pick up on old ideas, as long as you "complete" them this week). If you've done that - you're sweet! Obviously this is not an easy rule to police, so you should consider it more of a personal challenge than a hard and fast rule.

I personally find that imposing a time limit helps me to make compositional/mixing decisions quickly and run with it rather than labouring over small segments/elements of a track for a long time. I feel that doing WB in 2012 helped me develop an strong intuition for what sounds good and drastically increased my production time. It's worth giving it a shot I think! You might surprise yourself.

16

(8 replies, posted in General Discussion)

Yes, good luck!