Weeklybeats is a 52 week long music project in which artists compose and publicly release 1 song a week for the entire year.
Starting January 1st 2024 GMT each participant will have one week to upload one finished composition. Any style of music or selection of instruments are welcomed and encouraged. Sign up or Login to get started or check our FAQ for any help or questions you may have.

WeeklyBeats.com / Music / fc's music / Part 3 (Rapid Eye Movement)

Part 3 (Rapid Eye Movement)

By fc on July 12, 2014 6:30 am

Part 3 of my ongoing work. This features the voice of Robert Ashley, talking about his career. Robert Ashley passed away earlier this year.
Voice from: http://www.ubu.com/sound/ashley.html

All done in Live/Max4Live. More sine waves. Beware. Let it fill your listening space. Step back.

Ashleyesque. The voice chop is sublime. You're really trying to kill what's left of my hearing with those sine waves, aren't you?

Jim Wood wrote:

Ashleyesque. The voice chop is sublime. You're really trying to kill what's left of my hearing with those sine waves, aren't you?


Thanks Jim. Not trying to kill your hearing! It's quite interesting how people have a… fairly strong response to frequencies above about 2.5kHz, despite our faculties extending to at least 20kHz. Obviously the higher frequencies have higher energy, but people don't often talk about the impact of low frequencies (which require much higher energy to achieve the same volume). Fascinating.

I think it's because that's the frequency range most human speech is in (Darth Vader excluded), so we'd be most sensitive to sounds in that area.

Jim Wood wrote:

I think it's because that's the frequency range most human speech is in (Darth Vader excluded), so we'd be most sensitive to sounds in that area.


As far as I'm aware, sensitivity doesn't change across the frequencies (though happy to be corrected); the role certain frequencies play in our spatialisation of the world certainly varies, though.

I really like the clicks and vocal edits.  Are the clicks a byproduct of non-zero edits on the vocal sample or are they a separate entity?  Great tone interplay later too.  The frequencies were friendlier on my ears compared to last week.  smile

rdomain wrote:

I really like the clicks and vocal edits.  Are the clicks a byproduct of non-zero edits on the vocal sample or are they a separate entity?  Great tone interplay later too.  The frequencies were friendlier on my ears compared to last week.  smile


Thanks man.
The clicks are the click~ object in Max/M4L, triggered by note-on input. So they are controlled in this case by MIDI, I was trying to modulate their pitch but that didn't work in the timeframe I was willing to commit.

I'd love to hear if anyone puts it through some serious subs, because there is a B-2 in there somewhere, which is pretty low.

Ok cool.  Yeah I was referring to that low tone as it affects the way you hear the upper frequency drone.  Kind of a sidechaining effect.  I'm on my studio monitors so I can hear it but I'm sure a big PA would fill the room!

rdomain wrote:

Ok cool.  Yeah I was referring to that low tone as it affects the way you hear the upper frequency drone.  Kind of a sidechaining effect.  I'm on my studio monitors so I can hear it but I'm sure a big PA would fill the room!

Yes! And the effect is more pronounced the more space you allow the piece to fill!

True dat.  B-2 has some length to travel to fill it's role!  Oh, and I forgot to post my silly gif title reference.  wink

Hahaha, when I was naming it I kept abbreviating to REM, and thinking of exactly that!

Solid. I have a couple of books here about pediatric sleep 'n such, and this makes a fabulous soundtrack. No but seriously, I love the landscape of clicks, voice fragments, and tones - very visceral. You paint well.

Wonderful sounds, thanks!

colorful grey wrote:

Solid. I have a couple of books here about pediatric sleep 'n such, and this makes a fabulous soundtrack. No but seriously, I love the landscape of clicks, voice fragments, and tones - very visceral. You paint well.


I find the painting analogy interesting. It's not the first time it's been made in relation to my work, so I thank you.

tatecarson wrote:

Wonderful sounds, thanks!


No, thank you!

Excellent track all the way through, it feels like it develops very naturally. Well done!

Plantrain wrote:

Excellent track all the way through, it feels like it develops very naturally. Well done!


Cheers!

This project is awesome. Each one is very unique and interesting

This was interesting.  The high frequencies didn't hurt much.  Of course my hearing is dead above about 14K.  Sometimes I have fun at home playing a 15K tone loudly to drive my wife and kids nuts while I can't hear it at all.  Too much work around loud aircraft and industrial machinery in my past.

Amazing Ashley homage, love it!

You need to login to leave a comment.
Login Sign-up