The highlighted option has a typo, "havn't".
should be hasn't
Um.. no. "Music you have not listened to." "Haven't" is the correct contraction for have not in American english.
Saskrotch wrote:should be hasn't
Um.. no. "Music you have not listened to." "Haven't" is the correct contraction for have not in American english.
Um.. Yeah. As in music he has not listened to. Open a fuckin book some time
I would've gone with "ain't yet".
"H'ain't" works here, too.
To be true to my region, though, I should vote for "ain't yet heard, 'n'at."
Putting in a vote for the fix to be 'Pick up your game son.'
The rule is That “have” is used when the subject is “I”, “you”, “they” and “has” is used with “it”, “she”, and “he”.
Phil Harmonic wrote:Um.. no. "Music you have not listened to." "Haven't" is the correct contraction for have not in American english.
Um.. Yeah. As in music he has not listened to. Open a fuckin book some time
Before you start throwing eff words around, you might consider actually learning the grammatical rules of your native language. Because you're wrong. It doesn't say "he" which would use the third person singular conjugation of the verb "have" which is "has." It says "I" which requires the first person singular conjugation "have."
I have.
You have.
He/she/it has.
Even if you were right (which you aren't), you don't have to be an ass.
That was a typo, I meant hadn't, you space age carpet munchers
That was a typo, I meant hadn't, you space age carpet munchers
It's still wrong. Had is the past-tense of have, so if the statement reads "Music I hadn't listened to yet" then the tenses become mixed: past (had) and future (yet).