The highlighted option has a typo, "havn't".
Offline
The future
Saskrotch wrote:
should be hasn't
Um.. no. "Music you have not listened to." "Haven't" is the correct contraction for have not in American english.
Offline
Chicago
Phil Harmonic wrote:
Saskrotch wrote:should be hasn't
Um.. no. "Music you have not listened to." "Haven't" is the correct contraction for have not in American english.
Um.. Yeah. As in music he has not listened to. Open a fuckin book some time
Offline
Pittsburgh, PA
Edmund Snyder wrote:
I would've gone with "ain't yet".
"H'ain't" works here, too.
To be true to my region, though, I should vote for "ain't yet heard, 'n'at."
Offline
Adelaide, Australia
Putting in a vote for the fix to be 'Pick up your game son.'
Offline
The future
The rule is That “have” is used when the subject is “I”, “you”, “they” and “has” is used with “it”, “she”, and “he”.
Offline
Oklahoma City, OK, USA
Saskrotch wrote:
Phil Harmonic wrote:Um.. no. "Music you have not listened to." "Haven't" is the correct contraction for have not in American english.
Um.. Yeah. As in music he has not listened to. Open a fuckin book some time
Before you start throwing eff words around, you might consider actually learning the grammatical rules of your native language. Because you're wrong. It doesn't say "he" which would use the third person singular conjugation of the verb "have" which is "has." It says "I" which requires the first person singular conjugation "have."
I have.
You have.
He/she/it has.
Even if you were right (which you aren't), you don't have to be an ass.
Offline
Chicago
That was a typo, I meant hadn't, you space age carpet munchers
Offline
Melbourne, Australia
Saskrotch wrote:
That was a typo, I meant hadn't, you space age carpet munchers
It's still wrong. Had is the past-tense of have, so if the statement reads "Music I hadn't listened to yet" then the tenses become mixed: past (had) and future (yet).