<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[WeeklyBeats.com - FM Synthesis talk for WB users]]></title>
		<link>https://weeklybeats.com/forums/topic/5441/fm-synthesis-talk-for-wb-users/</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in FM Synthesis talk for WB users.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 17:55:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: FM Synthesis talk for WB users]]></title>
			<link>https://weeklybeats.com/forums/post/82103/#p82103</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>boomlinde says:</i></b><p>Agreed! When you have a chain of four operators, sound design can be a lot of trial and error, but I think it gets more fluent after a while. The effect tweaking has on the spectral content is not as naturally obvious to people as with simple filters, and there are no good metaphors to describe it.</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 17:55:43 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://weeklybeats.com/forums/post/82103/#p82103</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: FM Synthesis talk for WB users]]></title>
			<link>https://weeklybeats.com/forums/post/82095/#p82095</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>Lazerbeat says:</i></b><p>I think you are right. One thing I&#039;m starting to suspect though, FM seems to be a very subtle art. Tiny alterations in envelopes can drastically change the sound, I feel more so then with subtractive synthesis</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 15:45:14 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://weeklybeats.com/forums/post/82095/#p82095</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: FM Synthesis talk for WB users]]></title>
			<link>https://weeklybeats.com/forums/post/82088/#p82088</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>midimachine says:</i></b><p>Not that much later though... Probably &lt;2ms in reality.</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 06:46:16 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://weeklybeats.com/forums/post/82088/#p82088</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: FM Synthesis talk for WB users]]></title>
			<link>https://weeklybeats.com/forums/post/82083/#p82083</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>Lazerbeat says:</i></b><div class="quotebox"><cite>boomlinde wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>Tthe carrier attack for the noise pair. I think a real snare starts rattling slightly after the initial pop on the skin.</p></blockquote></div><p>That is a great point, the rattle for a snare is springs streched across the bottom of the drum right? You hear the rattle when they snap BACK ergo they much be later than the initial hit, I never thought of that!</p><p><img src="https://weeklybeats.com/forums/img/smilies/heart.gif" width="15" height="15" alt="heart" /> this thread.</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 03:25:44 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://weeklybeats.com/forums/post/82083/#p82083</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: FM Synthesis talk for WB users]]></title>
			<link>https://weeklybeats.com/forums/post/82077/#p82077</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>little-scale says:</i></b><p>Love some good FM, wish I was better at programming some sweet lead lines and percussion though.</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 00:53:50 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://weeklybeats.com/forums/post/82077/#p82077</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: FM Synthesis talk for WB users]]></title>
			<link>https://weeklybeats.com/forums/post/82065/#p82065</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>Theta_Frost says:</i></b><p>Love FM!&nbsp; If I could find Virt&#039;s talk I would link it now...&nbsp; But FM really is great.&nbsp; The timbre is just so unique!&nbsp; For a while I&#039;ve been working on Genny FM rave DJ sets ala Hizmi, to no avail.&nbsp; Perhaps that would be a good point to focus on in the coming weeks.&nbsp; I would love to hear some FM tracks on WB, link them if you make them.&nbsp; FM heads unite!</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 22:18:15 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://weeklybeats.com/forums/post/82065/#p82065</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: FM Synthesis talk for WB users]]></title>
			<link>https://weeklybeats.com/forums/post/82057/#p82057</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>boomlinde says:</i></b><p>These snares are great!</p><p>The pair algorithm is probably best, yeah. Max out the feedback as you suggested (or at least until you get a good crackly noise) for the snare part. Then, for the other pair, use a short, snappy decay (no or very little sustain) for the modulator and a slightly longer one for the carrier to get both a pop and a ringing tone for the drum part. Experiment with the decays, and also the carrier attack for the noise pair. I think a real snare starts rattling slightly after the initial pop on the skin.</p><p>I&#039;m not sure how the bass drums are gone (I&#039;m spoiled with note slides in TFM <img src="https://weeklybeats.com/forums/img/smilies/smile.png" width="15" height="15" alt="smile" />) but I guess you should focus on two operators as for the drum part of the snare. I hope that is of some help.</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 19:16:47 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://weeklybeats.com/forums/post/82057/#p82057</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: FM Synthesis talk for WB users]]></title>
			<link>https://weeklybeats.com/forums/post/82047/#p82047</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>Lazerbeat says:</i></b><p>Yah, I think a lot of stuff I have found on the internet is either really pretty basic &quot;this is a modulator this is a carrier&quot; type stuff or terrifying quantam math that would scare Spock shitless. Not much in the intermediate areas where I am.</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 16:11:10 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://weeklybeats.com/forums/post/82047/#p82047</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: FM Synthesis talk for WB users]]></title>
			<link>https://weeklybeats.com/forums/post/82046/#p82046</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>jiffypop23 says:</i></b><p>I&#039;ve come to terms that FM synthesis is a form of wizardry.</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 15:45:07 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://weeklybeats.com/forums/post/82046/#p82046</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[FM Synthesis talk for WB users]]></title>
			<link>https://weeklybeats.com/forums/post/82045/#p82045</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>Lazerbeat says:</i></b><p>I&#039;m super interested in finally unraveling the mysteries of FM synthesis as part of my weeklybeats project. I have a rudimentary grasp of FM and can manage quite a lot of sounds I like, eg, nice simulated filtery lead and bass sounds, little percussive tinny sounds and probably enough electric pianos to last a life time but there are a few sounds which I really have trouble with. </p><p>Alex Mauer posted an AWESOME <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qd7OU66XE6c&amp;feature=related" target="_blank">video</a> of custom drum sounds and 2 or 3 of them have me stumped. The snappy kick an boxy snare in the first drum loop and the very poppy/finger snappy sound from 0:15 to 0:20.</p><p>Im guessing the kick and the snare are made with a pair of modulators going into a pair of carriers with FB on op 4 using only sine waves (as im pretty sure that is all the FB01 had) but anyone have any more specific ideas?</p><p>Any other FM fans in the house?</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 15:34:01 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://weeklybeats.com/forums/post/82045/#p82045</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
