<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[WeeklyBeats.com - Weekly Retrograde]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="https://weeklybeats.com/forums/feed/atom/topic/5833/"/>
	<updated>2014-07-07T14:22:43Z</updated>
	<generator>PunBB</generator>
	<id>https://weeklybeats.com/forums/topic/5833/weekly-retrograde/</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Weekly Retrograde]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://weeklybeats.com/forums/post/89060/#p89060"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>And there it goes: <a href="http://weeklybeats.com/#/kineticturtle/music/starkly-patterned-ursine-mechanica" target="_blank">http://weeklybeats.com/#/kineticturtle/ &#133; -mechanica</a></p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[kineticturtle]]></name>
				<uri>https://weeklybeats.com/kineticturtle</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2014-07-07T14:22:43Z</updated>
			<id>https://weeklybeats.com/forums/post/89060/#p89060</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Weekly Retrograde]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://weeklybeats.com/forums/post/89051/#p89051"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Well here we go; Weekly Retrograde #1 will go live today. If anyone else decides to participate, I&#039;m tagging my posts weeklyretrograde and including a link to the sister piece in the description, as well as an explanation of their relationship. Hope everyone had a great week!</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[kineticturtle]]></name>
				<uri>https://weeklybeats.com/kineticturtle</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2014-07-06T15:14:38Z</updated>
			<id>https://weeklybeats.com/forums/post/89051/#p89051</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Weekly Retrograde]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://weeklybeats.com/forums/post/89048/#p89048"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>i like wankery</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[george bowles]]></name>
				<uri>https://weeklybeats.com/george+bowles</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2014-07-02T20:29:44Z</updated>
			<id>https://weeklybeats.com/forums/post/89048/#p89048</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Weekly Retrograde]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://weeklybeats.com/forums/post/89045/#p89045"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>The term &quot;academic wankery&quot; is intended as a joke, don&#039;t read into it too much. <img src="https://weeklybeats.com/forums/img/smilies/wink.png" width="15" height="15" alt="wink" /></p><p>Thanks y&#039;all!</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[kineticturtle]]></name>
				<uri>https://weeklybeats.com/kineticturtle</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2014-07-01T16:35:43Z</updated>
			<id>https://weeklybeats.com/forums/post/89045/#p89045</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Weekly Retrograde]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://weeklybeats.com/forums/post/89044/#p89044"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Lovely idea. I won&#039;t do it, but it&#039;s a lovely idea. </p><p>I find it really weird that music is &quot;academic wankery&quot; if there is some hypothesis/theory involved: i.e. serialism. How that falls into academic wankery is well beyond my comprehension, but there you have it. I guess I am, in fact, an academic wanker!</p><p>Yes, many congratulations on your child! What an effort.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[fc]]></name>
				<uri>https://weeklybeats.com/fc</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2014-07-01T04:24:22Z</updated>
			<id>https://weeklybeats.com/forums/post/89044/#p89044</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Weekly Retrograde]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://weeklybeats.com/forums/post/89042/#p89042"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>That&#039;s a good idea!</p><p>Congratulation for your second child!</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Pocaille]]></name>
				<uri>https://weeklybeats.com/pocaille</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2014-06-30T19:44:49Z</updated>
			<id>https://weeklybeats.com/forums/post/89042/#p89042</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Weekly Retrograde]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://weeklybeats.com/forums/post/89041/#p89041"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;m very excited for the imminent birth of my second child, which is due to occur any day/hour/minute now. This impending event does raise concerns about my ability to keep up on Weekly Beats in the fashion I&#039;d like, so I&#039;ve proposed to myself the following exercise, which I&#039;m sharing here in case anyone else </p><p>I intend to revisit - in various ways - the first half of the year, in reverse order. This does NOT mean that I&#039;ll be simply remixing existing material (although that is an option for any particular week), but using a variety of methods - borrowing a melody, a subject or an instrumentation, reusing a set of samples, etc. The goal is to avoid the rut I often find myself in where I have difficulty committing to an idea, without eliminating the possibility of essentially new compositions.</p><p>For example, yesterday I posted this tune, which I&#039;m very happy with:<br /><a href="http://weeklybeats.com/#/kineticturtle/music/pandatron-2000" target="_blank">http://weeklybeats.com/#/kineticturtle/ &#133; atron-2000</a><br /><a class="postimg" href="https://farm4.staticflickr.com/3838/14350921159_2544b28045_o.gif" title="https://farm4.staticflickr.com/3838/14350921159_2544b28045_o.gif" id="forum_image_50521031"><img src="https://farm4.staticflickr.com/3838/14350921159_2544b28045_o.gif" /></a></p><p>Now I could take any number of angles with this.<br />I could write another song about pandas, or any other ursine subject;<br />I could record another track with LSDJ, guitar, accordion, electric piano and vocals;<br />I could write another song based on something my toddler said;<br />I could even arrange another song with an unexpected Mike Patton-ey rap section.</p><p>What I think I&#039;ll actually do is take the main melody, which is nearly a 12-tone row, and complete the row and extrapolate it into a piece.</p><p><a class="postimg" href="https://farm4.staticflickr.com/3926/14541318721_97bccc51fd_b.jpg" title="https://farm4.staticflickr.com/3926/14541318721_97bccc51fd_b.jpg" id="forum_image_73326409"><img src="https://farm4.staticflickr.com/3926/14541318721_97bccc51fd_b.jpg" /></a></p><p>etc.</p><p>Now if this interests you and you&#039;d like to follow suit, you certainly don&#039;t have to be as crazy as I am (or as into early 20th century academic wankery as I am), but my goal is to be as creative with my methods as I usually am with writing pieces 100% from scratch. I just think revisiting things will be fun, and giving me a leaping off point will keep me on track through the rest of the year.</p><p>Whadda y&#039;all think?</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[kineticturtle]]></name>
				<uri>https://weeklybeats.com/kineticturtle</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2014-06-30T19:04:32Z</updated>
			<id>https://weeklybeats.com/forums/post/89041/#p89041</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
