Just for the "what the heck of it," I droped your piece into a  M$L granualtor followed with a resonator. I think it would make for a really superb rhythm track. With your permission (and full source credit), of course.

Just for the "what the heck of it," I droped your piece into a M$L granualtor followed with a resonator. I think it would make for a really superb rhythm track. With your permission (and full source credit), of course.

Be my guest! Pleased you like it. I'll change the license for you.

[quote=Jim Wood]Just for the "what the heck of it," I droped your piece into a M$L granualtor followed with a resonator. I think it would make for a really superb rhythm track. With your permission (and full source credit), of course.[/quote] Be my guest! Pleased you like it. I'll change the license for you.

Coming along nicely. Check WB 33 :-)

[quote=vinpous][quote=Jim Wood]Just for the "what the heck of it," I droped your piece into a M$L granualtor followed with a resonator. I think it would make for a really superb rhythm track. With your permission (and full source credit), of course.[/quote] Be my guest! Pleased you like it. I'll change the license for you.[/quote] Coming along nicely. Check WB 33 :-)

very nice. Love this kind of field recordings and processing!

very nice. Love this kind of field recordings and processing!

Sounds awesome; would you recommend that particular recorder?

Sounds awesome; would you recommend that particular recorder?

Thanks.

For its price I think it's pretty rad. I got it because it has the capability (and mic sensitivity) to record up to about 40kHz at high resolution audio. One downside is that it appears to cap the filesize at 2gb. Which should be okay for most purposes (or maybe that's a cap of the fat file system?).

There are better recorders out though. The best I've used is the Roland R26, but the price difference is pretty huge. I also own a Zoom H4N which is pretty good and offers more functionality than the Tascam.

[quote=encym]Sounds awesome; would you recommend that particular recorder?[/quote] Thanks. For its price I think it's pretty rad. I got it because it has the capability (and mic sensitivity) to record up to about 40kHz at high resolution audio. One downside is that it appears to cap the filesize at 2gb. Which should be okay for most purposes (or maybe that's a cap of the fat file system?). There are better recorders out though. The best I've used is the Roland R26, but the price difference is pretty huge. I also own a Zoom H4N which is pretty good and offers more functionality than the Tascam.

I had to hop over here and check this out after listening to Jim Wood's week 33 track.  It's very cool what he did with it, but I also have to say you got some fantastic sounds here in the original.  I've tried to record some epic rainstorms in the past and they've sounded okay, but never quite as cool as they sound in real life.  This really puts me right there.

I had to hop over here and check this out after listening to Jim Wood's week 33 track. It's very cool what he did with it, but I also have to say you got some fantastic sounds here in the original. I've tried to record some epic rainstorms in the past and they've sounded okay, but never quite as cool as they sound in real life. This really puts me right there.

Cheers for the insights vinpous!

[quote=vinpous][quote=encym]Sounds awesome; would you recommend that particular recorder?[/quote] Thanks. For its price I think it's pretty rad. I got it because it has the capability (and mic sensitivity) to record up to about 40kHz at high resolution audio. One downside is that it appears to cap the filesize at 2gb. Which should be okay for most purposes (or maybe that's a cap of the fat file system?). There are better recorders out though. The best I've used is the Roland R26, but the price difference is pretty huge. I also own a Zoom H4N which is pretty good and offers more functionality than the Tascam.[/quote] Cheers for the insights vinpous!