WeeklyBeats wrote:

2 - The track has been uploaded or made available before the week in question.

So does this mean if it's uploaded before all the tracks for the week are released, OR if it's uploaded somewhere before the LAST week's tracks are released?

pretty sure it means the latter. it would be way too stringent if it were the former, imo.

if I used THOSE samples it's because there was a reason

Well in all honesty, if it gets taken down of Weeklybeats, what gives? You still made the track and you can do whatever else you want with it Just if you do it again and again you'd be banned and that's not nice, so perhaps as Lazerbeat said, Weeklybeats is not the project you are looking for.

2 - The track has been uploaded or made available before the week in question.

So does this mean if it's uploaded before all the tracks for the week are released, OR if it's uploaded somewhere before the LAST week's tracks are released?

like, i finished a song this week, kind of want to upload it, but i don't want it to get taken down if i do.

I understand that there are rules imposed and of course i'll be careful in my future upload (as i said at the end of my post)

It's all very good to have an emotional attachment to a sample and needing to put it in a person creation such as music. If this is the case for anyone then perhaps just upload it to your own website and not this one. Don't stop making the music you want and the way you want to, just appreciate that this website has submission rules. Put your song on your website instead of this one. Chuck it on SoundCloud and link it to us in the forums, just dont submit it as an entry to Weekly Beats. Having a personal meaning attached to a sample isn't a trump card to bypass the rules. The rules have always been clearly stated so it is a choice to break those rules should you upload a song containing copyrighted samples. People may feel they have the right to use a copyrighted sample based on the meaning it bestows (and more power to them) but they don't have the right to feel cheated or hard done by should their submission be removed for breaking the rules; rules they chose to break.

tl;dr - It's such an easy rule to follow. If you need to put a copyrighted sample in your song then go for it, just don't use it as your Weekly Beats submission.

Sheesh. So much telling off. I'm beginning to feel like I'm back in primary school (which I did everything to avoid, BTW).

WHERE IS THE LOVE?

tl;dr - It's such an easy rule to follow. If you need to put a copyrighted sample in your song then go for it, just don't use it as your Weekly Beats submission.

if I used THOSE samples it's because there was a reason, not because it was of good quality (or as you said to choose it because it was free), but because there was a meaning of why I used them, because even if it's taken from a masterpiece (which is only available from the business industry) it's also a part of me (I think), as it is what I am and what I like and that's why I want to share it and rework it!!)

I agree that the admins. shouldn't have to deal with "our" oversights, but since my hint at a registration cut-off point and the crap that followed, have felt the WB's rule system in general a little spurious.

I heart WeeklyBeats .. I also agree very much with what you have written above.

- edit -

Quick clarification, weeklybeats is not the internet, nor is it music culture as a whole. Its a small site run buy a group of friends who wanted to write a bunch of songs this year. We established a set of rules to run the site in a way we are happy with. If you don't like the rules, please go elsewhere. If you are able to work within the rules (which I hope you are cause your stuff is interesting) then please continue to contribute.

the point is follow the rules maybe?

its not like they have a ton of them and its not like they are all that hard.

And the point the point of the rules is to keep the Admins of Weekly Beats from being implicated in Copyright Infringement.

Yes but that's not the point!
if I used THOSE samples it's because there was a reason, not because it was of good quality (or as you said to choose it because it was free), but because there was a meaning of why I used them, because even if it's taken from a masterpiece (which is only available from the business industry) it's also a part of me (I think), as it is what I am and what I like and that's why I want to share it and rework it!!
I guess the only solution is to use it, but change it so hardly that nobody except me can recognize it, and that's what most electronic artist does (well not all of them )

the point is follow the rules maybe?

its not like they have a ton of them and its not like they are all that hard.